We seem to have progressed now to the new-bifocals nausea stage. I thought I wouldn't have it this time around, having had five years to get used to a line in my line of vision -- so to speak. But either my new glasses are making me sick, or my vitamins are making me sick, or something I ate is making me sick, or I'm just sick. Whatever the reason, I'm taking the opportunity of school's being done for the day to sit very, very, very still and think about other things. And so this post is a catch-all for the flotsam and jetsam in my mind today, which is more flotsamy and jetsamy than usual. If you can imagine such a thing.
First: sports. Or, if you like, sport as a concept. This isn't something I write about a lot, because it isn't something I think about a lot. We are not a very sporty family. My husband played football from elementary school through his junior year in high school, when he blew out his knee, acquiring scars that make wearing shorts an invitation to total strangers to ask, "Man, what happened to you?" As you might imagine, he hasn't been too invested in grooming any of our children to play football. Our older son played YMCA soccer for a couple of years, when he was seven and eight, and it was fun, but not that fun. Our younger son, at four (okay, I'll admit it now: we were idiots), was for a brief time listed as a member of a YMCA team and went so far as to consent to get up out of the grass, where he liked to lie, and sit on the bench and drink Gatorade with the rest of the kids. "Gettin' some fluids into the man," his coach said with what I still think of as a generosity of enthusiasm. The same child later went to a three-day baseball camp sponsored by our local parks and rec, and for those three days he was speaking in tongues with happiness, but when I asked him whether he wanted to be on an actual team, he said, "Nah," and turned away with a shrug to try to persuade his sister to go out back with him and play baseball. She said, to the best of my recollection, what both our girls have always said about sports participation: "Not today."
Lately, though, I've been thinking about organized sports as I haven't done for a long time. Our older son is a ninth grader, and his ambition is to go to West Point, for which he shows every sign of having the grades and the leadership experience, but not so much the access to organized team sports that would look . . . familiar, I guess, and readily comprehensible . . . in his application dossier. This is not to say that he's not doing sports, mind you. Over the last two years, he has made a runner of himself; he began by training for the YMCA 5K fundraiser that happens every December almost literally in our front yard, and with the passage of time this training has evolved into an elaborate self-imposed fitness regimen including not only running but sit-ups, jump-squats, weight-lifting, and I'm not sure what all else. I've just signed him up for a YMCA class -- do you see a theme emerging here? Where would we be without the Y? -- which will train him to compete in the Spartan obstacle/mud race in March, and his friend Andrew, who also likes to run, has just sent him information about another mud race in April, so there's another competition on the calendar, something to quantify, a little, what he's doing essentially to prove to himself that he can.
So I've already determined, in my mind, that when the time comes, I can say with a clear conscience that he has "lettered" in a sport, though I'm not entirely sure what to call it, other than Running and Stuff. What seems important to me is the spirit in which he pursues this sport, not so much for its own sake as for the sake of his larger goals, and for the virtues attendant on self-discipline. It's far less about external competition than it is about a battle with the self, for mastery.
I've come to be depressed about the role of competition in activities available to children: in sports, obviously, but also dance, for crying out loud. Every dance studio in our small downtown displays a row of trophies in its front window, as if that were what you were looking for: "No, I want the winningest ballet studio in town, thank you." The primary function of ballet, or tap, or jazz, or whatever the studio offers (usually they offer a a little of everything and then some) apparently is to be the gateway drug to beauty pageants and cheerleading. No, thank you very much. Not today. Our youngest daughter takes Irish step dance from a woman (also our parish DRE) whose troupes don't compete, but perform in nursing homes and at cultural festivals. They're beautiful, wonderful dancers -- and they're in it for the fun of dancing and performing, not to be better than anyone else, which was what we wanted for our daughter. Dance keeps her moving; furthermore, it brings joy to her life without being her whole life, which is the role this kind of childhood experience ought to occupy.
In light of all this, it was with interest that I opened the latest issue of Mater et Magistra magazine, dedicated to sports in the life of the Catholic homeschooler, and after an initial read-through, I wanted to share what I think are highlights.
From Matthew Davidson, Ph.d, on what's unhealthy in our youth-sports culture:
In alarming numbers parents and coaches are ruining sport for kids by applying too much pressure, too much training and competition, too much specialization (i.e., having kids concentrate on one sport from year one in hopes of a competitive advantage).
Too many parents and coaches see sport (and unfortunately their kids) as a means to an end -- championships, scholarships, and a professional career in sport, in spite of the fact that [this focus] often leads to kids hating sports . . . and it rarely leads to the ends those coaches and parents desire so badly.Meanwhile, Mary Ellen Barrett, Ana Braga-Henebry, and MacBeth Derham take up the theme of stepping outside the youth-sports box in the pursuit of lifelong habits of physical fitness: family biking, swimming, and walking, for example, or . . . wait for it . . . leaving kids to their own devices, to make up their own group games. MacBeth writes,
The other day I passed a few children playing around a tree in the churchyard. They had encircled the tree and were singing a song. I stopped for a few minutes and watched, wondering why it was such a captivating scene. Then it occurred to me that in our neighborhood, with plenty of families, I rarely see any children outside playing unless they are in a soccer field or baseball diamond. I recalled another image -- one evening at the beach, the homeschooled kids gathered for a disorganized game of beach baseball. They recruited other children to play, to the astonishment of their parents. Is it so unusual these days that children participate in informal games without coaches? I hope not.I hope not, too. Or, rather, what I hope is to build, or maintain, or preserve, a corner of the culture in which these things have room to happen.
Finally, it's the feast of St. John Bosco, who always seems to me one of the most irresistible of saints (okay, he was a good-looking Italian guy . . . that certainly doesn't hurt . . . ), a man who gave his life to understanding and educating boys. His vision of boys happy in his Oratory seems a fitting note on which to end here:
Valfre then showed me the boys just as they were at that time, the same features, height and so on. It seemed to me that I was in recreation in the Oratory of those days. Everywhere I looked there was life, movement and joy; some were running, some jumping, some skipping. Some were playing leap-frog, some tag, some with a ball; in one corner was a huddle of boys hanging on the words of one of the priests as he told them a story; in another corner a cleric was playing with a group of lads. There were songs and laughter on all sides, Brothers and Priests everywhere and the joyful cries of the boys around them. It was perfectly clear that the greatest cordiality and confidence existed between the boys and their superiors. I was overjoyed by the sight and Valfre said to me: “As you can see familiarity breeds affection and affection breeds confidence. This is what opens hearts; the boys can open up without fear to their teachers, assistants and superiors. They become frank both inside and outside the confessional and in general they show great docility to the commands of those of whose love they are sure.”And now, new-bifocal nausea or not, I need to go be in the midst of my children, to foster some great cordiality and confidence, for the sake of Don Bosco today.
20 comments:
Seen this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYy2GnFFz7s
The martial arts organization Geoff is involved in made a decision about five years ago not to hold any more tournaments because they felt that the kind of competition those encourage wasn't useful. They still hold frequent grading and there's a complicated ranking system, but that's about self-mastery (as you say) and self-discipline instead of competition.
I don't think team-sports competition is bad, but I have practically zero interest in it, and Geoff and I will both be very surprised if we produce any organized sports enthusiasts. If we do, they'll be getting their own selves to practises at ungodly hours.
No, I don't think it's bad, either, in and of itself -- and it is motivating. And winning/losing does give people an opportunity to learn sportsmanship: being a good winner/loser. I think that as something that's permeated our common life, though, as a substitute for leisure, the youth-sports culture is definitely problematic, particularly as it supersedes children's own impulse to *make up* games and to interact with each other, and amuse themselves, without adult intervention. Children's sports often supersede family life, too. You risk looking like a neglectful parent by depriving your children of all these wonderful opportunities for growth . . . but honestly, some kinds of neglect are healthier than the alternative. I think, anyway.
I'm going to post that video, Paul. Thank you!
Around here there is an organization that promotes the concept of play as an alternative to the competitiveness of youth sports. So you get the weird spectacle of parents who bring their children at specified times to specified places, in order that other adults may instruct the little ones in such activities as bean-bag-tossing. Up neglect, say I.
We pulled our girls out of team sports for most of the same reasons you mention. Later, when the boys wanted to do something more active, we started karate, and eventually all the family got into it. We go to a pretty laid-back school; it holds tournaments but little attention is paid to them compared to the individual discipline of class work.
I went to USAFA for a year before I had to leave for a new-found eye problem. Good luck to your son and his dream of West Point!
I think if he's doing mud runs and 5-10Ks, and is also working out, his application will be great! He can always find a way to write about his physical activity and what motivates him in his personal essay... there's always a way to turn that essay into anything it needs to be! nenAEFa 070
OK, scheduled, adult-directed "free play" is one of the weirder concepts I've encountered in a long time, but is alas all too perfectly consistent with this whole disturbing cultural picture. And yes, up neglect.
Monica, thanks for your insight. I feel the same way that you do -- that this is excellent physical training (and it really knows no season, which is another advantage). And I hadn't thought about it before, but it is something that he can write about, as an extension of what he'd want to say about character.
And Anne-Marie, you've got runners as well, haven't you? I really like running for its low-maintenance-ness (though we do go through a lot of shoes, especially as the runner keeps growing) and its non-dependence on any direction or organization. A person can just get up in the morning, decide to run, and do it. Nobody has to drive him anywhere, nobody has to schedule it in, nobody else has to want to do it. Family life does not have to contort itself to accommodate it. All it really depends on is the desire of the runner to run. In all of this, I think, it is the perfect sport.
Though I have to admit, having a coach/trainer really does help push the runner to new levels. On his own, he runs out of ideas, so this class right now is a great thing. But once he's finished with it, he can take what he's learned and go, until he's ready for something else.
I think running would be the perfect sport if it weren't boring as all get out! But I'm in the minority; the runners outnumber the nonrunners in our family.
Well, yes, my insight is strictly that of the bystander . . .
In other words, it is the perfect sport for someone else to do.
Bifocals give me nausea too--so I have three pair of glasses--and I don't care, it works for me. And when you get old you get to do what you want, right?
I am WAY too cowed by doctors. And 22-year-olds wearing name badges. And pretty much anyone else. I need to sign up for some "Difficult Old Lady" class before it's too late.
One thing I will grant these bifocals, though: they are far more comfortable to read in than my old glasses ever were. I hardly ever looked through the reading segments, because I had to go practically cross-eyed to do it. I still think these glasses are too wide, and I don't like them much, but they are SO much more comfortable to read in.
But now I have a hard time seeing the computer screen. If it comes to trifocals, as I feel certain it will, and soon, I really will have three pairs of glasses. I'll make the nice lady at Wal-Mart make them for me, because I am not cowed by her.
The 'adult directed free play' reminds me a bit of the Cuddle Parties that some people were holding a few years ago, as a fill-in for those who didn't have friends or loved ones to cuddle with. Similar in creepy weirdness.
Just stumbling across this now.
I am so not sporty, but I do think it would be good to have some organized activities for the kids to do. Especially in winter when we're cooped up and they aren't running around outside. I'd love to find an Irish dance teacher/studio that doesn't do competitions. I'm just not interested in them dancing to compete, but I do think it's good exercise, fun to do. It's one of those things I wish I'd done when I was younger.
Melanie, I'm really kicking myself for not having joined the YMCA earlier. My kids have been doing a "Gym and Swim" class on Mondays which is not that expensive, but which does give them, at least once a week, a serious 2-hour physical and social outlet. It's not even that cold down here, but I am really grateful for the organized physical activity (otherwise I just kick them out to ride bikes, but some days that's just not feasible).
And I do wish you and your girls (and boys!) could teleport down here for Irish dance. It is fantastic exercise, especially when you subtract the competitive pressure. AND our teacher does a ceili dance at the end of each lesson, so parents get to join in and learn the Alabama Gal, or the Virginia Reel, or some kind of contra dance. It is very, very fun.
My sister-in-law loves her Y membership, but I keep looking at it and thinking it seems like a lot of money and I don't honestly know if we'll be able to use it enough to make it worth while. It's $50 to join and $83 a month. Plus you still have to pay for individual programs like swim lessons. I know it's not a huge amount of money but it's still a lot to pull from my monthly budget if we're really not going to use it regularly.
And that's the rub. The closest Y is 15 minutes away, which is just outside the radius of what feels like a short trip to me. If it were just up the street and if it were less money, I think that might push me over. But I just don't see how I can fit it into my weekly schedule when some days I can't even manage to do math and reading. I'm still struggling to figure out how to make things fit into a day crammed with four kids, now with a newborn just going to the grocery store feels impossible. But maybe when we don't have daily naps anymore our schedule will feel less cramped? I don't know how people do it, frankly.
Then again, I'd love to be in the position of having kids old enough to be kicked out to just ride bikes too. I think we just need to get to the point where we have more school aged kids than preschoolers and the center of gravity will shift and our family will have a totally different feel. Forgive me for going on at length, I'm kind of thinking out loud here, trying to figure out why it feel so impossible and whether I'm making silly excuses or it really is just not a good fit for right now.
I would love to teleport down there for the Irish dancing. That sounds fabulous. I keep asking around, hoping that I'll find something along those lines. There certainly is no shortage of Irish people here. I should try calling one of the Irish cultural centers and seeing if they have listings for teachers.
No, life really does get easier as kids get older, and these things start to seem possible. We didn't have a Y membership for years for the same reasons, even though in our case the Y really was just up the street. Now it's a 5-minute drive, which even with older kids makes me much more willing.
The homeschool gym classes have been very good, I have to say. My 9- and 10-year-olds had not had swimming lessons, ever, and that alone has been worth the price, and while it all does cost money, the cost is pretty competitive with other programs. They have made friends, too, which has been nice. We used the summer camp program pretty heavily last year, because I'd decided that some weeks, people just had to get out and do something away from me, and once I'd committed to that idea, I was committed to paying something . . . The camp program wasn't all that exciting, really, but one child had so much fun that he's counting the days until this summer, and the other is saying, "Meh . . . I'd rather go to art camp." The main thing is that for me it was kind of an ice-breaker with the Y -- I figured out how to use it and access things. Too often something like that will just seem like too much trouble even to figure out, let alone spend money on. But once I'd put my foot in the door, and started picking up brochures, we were on a roll. I am really grateful for the services they offer my 15-year-old, who's getting some serious athletic training without having to join any kind of team. This is truly a bargain of an arrangement.
Now that I think of it, I did schlep a baby and a toddler (and a grousing 10-year-old) to a good many Y soccer practices at one stage (I think we just paid the non-member fee), though by the time we were doing that, the baby wasn't quite a newborn any more . . . I really don't remember how we did it. I don't remember its being all that much fun, except for the kid who was playing, which was why we did it, of course. Both my older kids got into community theater at about the same time, and again, I have no real memory of any of it. I guess the littles just slept in the car a lot. We had the big gap thing going on, with older children who really wanted and needed to be doing things, so the little ones just had to adjust. In fact, our current burst of activity is probably my reaction to waking up one day and realizing that these kids are the same age as the others when the others were doing all these activities with such enjoyment. Another "oh, wait, you're not a baby, you're ten" moment.
In Cambridge we made use of the fantastic public pool facility (also just up the street), but the rub was that even when I had only two children, preschool and young-elementary aged, *Dad* was the one who took them swimming. He was a student and available a lot of the time, and that was something he did with them. If it had been up to me, it would never have happened. See "ice-breaker" above.
Post a Comment